Master Preparation II

Lesson 9: Playing against hanging pawns

Lecture by UMBC Chess Coach Igor Epshteyn

Hanging pawns are two pawns on adjacent files, separated by open or half-open files. In Lesson 5 of Master Preparation I, Master Epshteyn explained how to play with such pawns. Now, we will discuss how to play against hanging pawns.

There are four main advantages of hanging pawns: First, they help gain a space advantage by controlling central squares. This control especially diminishes the value of rival knights. Second, hanging pawns create dynamic opportunities for a central pawn advance (when the hanging pawns are on files c and d, typically it is the d pawn that will be advanced). Such an advance can create a dangerous passed pawn and squeeze additional space. In addition, such an advance can open diagonals for bishops in ambush. Third, hanging pawns create outposts for knights and rooks for attack. Fourth, the adjacent half-open files (e.g. b and d) supply quick transportation for the rooks on both flanks. To play against hanging pawns it is important to diminish and counter these advantages.

The main disadvantage of hanging pawns is that they can be hard to defend, especially in the ending. This disadvantage suggests several strategies: First, simplify the position and exchange down to an ending. Second, provoke a premature advance of one pawn, and then block the pawns. One way to provoke such an advance is to attack the pawns as many times as possible, from all possible directions. A third strategy is to destroy the side-by-side pawns by advancing pawns on the adjacent files.

An important feature of hanging pawns is that there often are opportunities to transform the hanging pawns into an advanced isolated pawn. Both sides must carefully evaluate the consequences of such transformations.

Game 1 is a recent encounter between two top world-class players (Gelfand and Adams) that illustrates typical opportunities for both sides in middle game positions with hanging pawns. The moves starting from Position 1 provide a highly instructive example of playing against hanging pawns, combining direct attack on the pawns with kingside attack. In Position 1, the hanging pawns occupy files e and f and arose from the King's Indian Defense.


Game 1: Gelfand-Adams (DosHermanos, 1995)

1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 e6
3. c4 Bb4
4. Nbd2 b6
5. a3 Bxd2
6. Qxd2 Bb7
7. e3 0-0
8. Be2 Ne4
9. Qd3 d5
10. b3 c5
11. 0-0 cxd4
12. exd4 Nd7
13. a4 Re8
14. Bf4 Nf8
15. h3 Ng6
16. Bh2 Rc8
17. Rfc1 dxc4
18. bxc4 Nd6
19. Bf1 Be4
20. Qe3 Bc6
21. Ne5 Bb7
22. Rd1 Nf5
23. Qd2 Nxe5
24. Bxe5 Re7
25. Bf4 Rec7
26. Be3 Qf6
27. a5 Qg6
28. axb6 axb6
29. Qd3 Rd8
30. Rab1 Nxd4
31. Qxg6 hxg6
32. Rxd4
draw

Position 1: Petrosian-Suetin (USSR Team Championship, 1954)

White: Kg1, Qd2, Re1, Rf1, Be2, Be3, Nc3, a2, b2, c4, d5, g2, h2.
Black (to move): Kg8, Qf6, Re8, Rf8, Bd7, Bg7, Nc5, a5, b7, c7, e5, f5, h6.

1. ... b6
2. Bh5 Re7
3. Bd1 Qd6
4. Bc2 Ref7
5. Kh1 Ra8
6. Re2 Qf8
7. Ref2 Nb7
8. Qe2 Nd6
9. c5 bxc5
10. Bxc5 Rb8
11. b3 Qc8
12. Qh5 Qa6
13. g4 f4
14. Re1 Qc8
15. Bxd6 cxd6
16. Bg6 Rf8
17. Ne4 f3
18. g5 Rf4
19. Rg1 Bf5
20. gxh6 Bxe4
21. Bxe4
1-0


Homework 1: Botvinnik-Szabo (Groningen, 1946)

White: Kg1, Qb2, Rc1, Rf1, Bh6, Ne5, a2, c4, d4, f2, g2, h2.
Black (to move): Kg8, Qd8, Rc8, Re8, Ba8, Be7, a6, b6, e6, f7, g6, h7.

Questions:

  1. Evaluate the position, and find vulnerable points for both sides.
  2. What are typical plans for each side? What is the best plan for this position? Calculate appropriate variations.
  3. What is deceptive in this position and why?

Homework 2: Szabo-Petrosian (Zurich, 1953)

White (to move): Kg1, Qe2, Rc1, Rd1, Bd3, Bh4, Nc3, Nf3, a2, b2, e3, f2, g2, h2.
Black: Kg8, Qd8, Ra8, Re8, Bb7, Be7, Nd7, Nf6, a6, c5, d5, f7, g7, h6.

Questions:

  1. Evaluate the position, and point out weaknesses for each side.
  2. Find appropriate plans for each side.
  3. Calculate variations for each major plan.
  4. What are the tactical features of this position?