Master Preparation II

Lesson 10: Typical plans in half-closed positions

Lecture by UMBC Chess Coach Igor Epshteyn

The center is half-closed if the pawn chains are blocked in the center and there is one open or half-closed file in the center. For example, such positions can arise from the King's Indian Defense (Averbach, Mackagonov, or classical variations) or from the modern Benoni defense. In this lesson we will discuss typical strategies for playing in half-closed, indian-type positions.

In half-closed positions, potential for play along the central open or half-closed file is important. Consequently, the side with kingside attacking chances often strives to exchange one pair of rooks, to reduce his opponent's activity along the file. White usually obtains a space advantage and thus Black often finds it difficult to maneuver. In addition, White often attempts to remove targets from Black's indian bishop, thereby reducing the potential threat of this bishop.

The first game illustrates how dangerous it can be for Black for Black to fix the pawn structure on the queenside. In this game, White pursued a long-term strategy of attacking on the kingside while limiting Black's queenside play.

In Game 2, White persistently carried out a similar four-step plan under significantly more complex conditions. First, White exchanged a pair of rook in order to reduce rook activity on the e file and to free White's rook to support the advance of White's f pawn. Second, White replaced his queen and bishop on the b1-h7 diagonal in order to create additional threats against the Black king, to support the defense of the queenside (disallowing a b5 breakthrough), and taking control of important squares on the e file. Third, by playing b3 and a4, White blocked Black's queenside play and removed targets from Black's indian bishop. Fourth, White advanced his kingside pawns to destroy black's kingside.


Game 1: Najdorf-Petrosian (Zurich, Interzonal 1953)

1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 d6
3. Nf3 g6
4. g3 Bg7
5. Bg2 0-0
6. 0-0 Nc6
7. Nc3 Bg4
8. h3 Bxf3
9. Bxf3 Nd7
10. Bg2 Nxd4
11. Bxb7 Rb8
12. Bg2 c5
13. e3 Ne6
14. Qc2 a5
15. Bd2 Ne5
16. b3 Qd7
17. Kh2 Nc6
18. Rad1 Ned8
19. Be1 Kh8
20. Na4 Qc8
21. Bc3 Bxc3
22. Nxc3 Qf5
23. Qxf5 gxf5
24. Rd5 Ne6
25. Rxf5 Nb4
26. Rh5 Ng7
27. Rh4 Nf5
28. Rf4 e6
29. Rd1 Rb6
30. Na4 Rbb8
31. Be4 Ng7
32. Rxd6 Nxa2
33. Nxc5
1-0

Game 2: Agzamov-Anand (Calcutta, 1986)

1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 Bg7
4. e4 d6
5. Be2 0-0
6. Bg5 c5
7. d5 e6
8. Qd2 exd5
9. exd5 Qb6
10. Nf3 Re8
11. 0-0 Bf5
12. Rae1 Bg4
13. h3 Bxf3
14. Bxf3 Nbd7
15. Rxe8 Rxe8
16. Qc2 a6
17. Bd2 Re7
18. b3 Ne8
19. g4 Qd8
20. a4 Bd4
21. Kg2 Ng7
22. Bd1 Re8
23. Ne4 Qe7
24. Re1 Qf8
25. Ng3 Rxe1
26. Bxe1 Qe7
27. Bd2 Ne8
28. a5 Qf6
29. Ne4 Qe5
30. f4 Qe7
31. Qd3 Nef6
32. Ng3 Bb2
33. g5 Ne8
34. h4 Ba3
35. Bg4 Ng7
36. Qe4 Qd8
37. Qe1 f5
38. gxf6 Nxf6
39. Be6 Kf8
40. f5
1-0

Game 3: Portish-Skembris (Tilburg, Interpolis 1994)

1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 Bg7
4. e4 0-0
5. Be2 d6
6. Bg5 c5
7. d5 a6
8. a4 Qa5
9. Bd2 e6
10. Nf3 Qc7
11. 0-0 exd5
12. exd5 Bg4
13. h3 Bxf3
14. Bxf3 Nbd7
15. Qc2 Rfe8
16. Rfe1 Ne5
17. Be2 Re7
18. f4 Ned7
19. Bf3 Rae8
20. Rxe7 Rxe7
21. Re1 Rxe1
22. Bxe1 Qb6
23. Bd2 Ne8
24. g4 h6
25. Kg2 Bd4
26. b3 Qd8
27. Ne2 Bf6
28. a5 g5
29. Ng3 Ng7
30. Ne4 Be7
31. Qc1 gxf4
32. Bxf4 Qxa5
33. Qb2 Ne8
34. Bd2 Qb6
35. Bxh6 Ne5
36. Be2 Bf8
37. Bd2 Bg7
38. Qc2 Qd8
39. Bg5 Qd7
40. Ng3 Bf6
41. Bc1 Ng6
42. Qe4 Nh4
43. Kf1 Be5
44. Bd3 Nf6
45. Qe3 Ng6
46. Ne2 Nh7
47. Bf5 Qd8
48. g5 Nhf8
49. Bc2 b5
50. Qe4 Qd7
51. Kg2 bxc4
52. bxc4 Qb7
53. h4 Nd7
54. h5 Ngf8
55. Ng1 Qb4
56. Nf3 a5
57. Bd2 Bc3
58. Bf4 Ne5
59. Bxe5 Bxe5
60. g6 fxg6
61. hxg6 Bf6
62. Nh2 Qd2
63. Kh3 Qh6
64. Kg2 Kg7
65. Ng4 Qxg6
66. Qxg6 Nxg6
67. Kf2 Ne5
draw

Questions:

  1. Correct White's 16th move according to the general plan discussed in the lecture.

  2. Explain White's 19th move.

  3. Comment on White's 21st move. What plan is White pursuing?