Real-Time Shading review form -- modified from SIGGRAPH review form
Reviewer Number:
Title:
Author:
1) Briefly describe the paper and its contribution to computer
graphics and interactive techniques. Please give your assessment
of the scope and magnitude of the paper's contribution.
2) Is the exposition clear? How could it be improved?
3) Are the references adequate? List any references that are needed.
4) Could the work be reproduced by one or more skilled graduate
students? Are all important algorithmic or system details discussed
adequately? Are the limitations and drawbacks of the work clear?
5) Give an overall rating of the work and the paper on a continuous
scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is worst and 5 is best. (In the SIGGRAPH
review, this ranking is explained as 1 = Reject, 2 = Doubtful, 3 =
Possibly accept, 4 = Probably accept, 5 = Accept).
6) Please rate your expertise in the subject area of the paper on a
continuous scale from 1 to 3, where: 1=Novice, 2=Some Knowledge,
3=Expert.
7) Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of
the submission. Include suggestions for improvement and publication
venues, if appropriate. Be thorough -- your explanation may be used by
the authors to improve their work. Be fair -- the authors spent a lot
of effort to prepare their paper, and your evaluation will be returned
to them.