-------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMSC 100 DRAFT REPORT REVIEW FORM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- AUTHOR'S NAME: TITLE OF REPORT: REVIEWER'S NAME: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY. Please summarize the main topic of the paper in one sentence. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OVERALL. Give an overall rating of the paper (mark with an X), and a one- to three-sentence summary of why you gave it that rating. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (E) Excellent [ ] (VG) Very Good [ ] (G) Good [ ] (F) Fair [ ] (P) Poor [ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- THOROUGHNESS. Does the report state a particular field, and three uses of computing in that field? Is there a discussion of social and/or ethical issues surround these applications of computing? Does the paper include a bibliography of relevant papers, and cite these papers where appropriate? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION. Are the descriptions of computing applications and methods given at an appropriate level of detail? Can a reader not familiar with the area follow the explanations? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORGANIZATION. Is the report well organized, to help the reader identify broad themes, concepts, research directions, and key papers/authors? Are there section headers that make it easy to follow the structure and flow of the paper? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATION. Is the paper generally well written? Are there significant spelling, grammar, or stylistic errors? Is the paper reasonably easy to read and understand? --------------------------------------------------------------------------