Date Review Done:

Title of paper:

Email Review to: krishna@umbc.edu by April 19, 5pm.

PART A
******

      1.  Are the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate? Please
comment.
            ___Yes
            ___No

      2.  Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate
references?  Please comment.
            ___References are sufficient and appropriate
            ___Important references are missing; more references are needed
            ___Number of references are excessive

         2b. Are the reference details complete? (Year, Location of
         conference, URL if a website is referred, etc.)

      3.  Does the introduction state the objectives of the manuscript in
terms that encourage the reader to read on? Please explain your answer.
            ___Yes
            ___Could be improved
            ___No

      4.  How would you rate the organization of the manuscript? Is it
focused?  Is the length appropriate for the topic? Please comment.
            ___Satisfactory
            ___Could be improved
            ___Poor

      5.  Please rate and comment on the readability of this manuscript.
            ___Easy to read
            ___Readable - but requires some effort to understand
            ___Difficult to read and understand
            ___Unreadable

PART B
******

1. Please summarize the paper in your own words and in 2-3 sentences.


2. Please provide detailed comments regarding the paper. Please be as
   specific as possible.


3. Please list any weaknesses of the paper, including completeness of
references, and any other suggestions to improve the paper.  Are there
sections that should be condensed or expanded?